Thursday, April 28, 2005
Old Ideas
I'm listening to W's press conference. I'm ready to tear my hair out. His answer to a question about the threat that North Korea's professed nuclear capability poses to neighboring countries, like Japan, was Missile Defense.
In response to a question about partisan politics in Washington he claimed that "some people don't like me," and that his party was the "party of ideas". Sure, old ideas. Missile defense will protect Japan from North Korea, and Americans care more about Social Security than they do about the war of their diminishing local social services. He went on to discuss the good things he'd done for America like limiting the amount of money for which maimed Americans can sue the companies who maimed them, and allowing creditors to take the homes of Americans who have filed for bankruptcy.
I held my bile through most of that huckster's speil, but what really made me angry was when he claimed to be working for "what's important to the American people" when all he offered was old ideas, tiresome repetitions, and platitudes.
In response to a question about partisan politics in Washington he claimed that "some people don't like me," and that his party was the "party of ideas". Sure, old ideas. Missile defense will protect Japan from North Korea, and Americans care more about Social Security than they do about the war of their diminishing local social services. He went on to discuss the good things he'd done for America like limiting the amount of money for which maimed Americans can sue the companies who maimed them, and allowing creditors to take the homes of Americans who have filed for bankruptcy.
I held my bile through most of that huckster's speil, but what really made me angry was when he claimed to be working for "what's important to the American people" when all he offered was old ideas, tiresome repetitions, and platitudes.
posted by Amanda, Thursday, April 28, 2005
4 Comments:
That is why I didn't watch the press conference. They are all walking cliches...
commented by
David Cho, 8:22 PM
David Cho, 8:22 PM
i couldn't watch it. i would have pecked out my own liver.
Although many of the issues you mention are valid ideas, I wanted to make a comment on one of them.
Bankrupcy and home ownership.
In order to be declared bankrupt, someone must not have assetts to cover his/her debts.
If someone has a house loan (mortgage) and default son it (doesn't pay) the bank can take it away. This happened BEFORE the Bankrupcy Laws enacted by Bush, and AFTER.
If someone has paid off a house, but has other debts, most states have Homestead Protection Acts. Those Laws protect the home from court settlements. (I know Massachusetts and Florida have such laws).
For those states that don't have Homestead Protection Acts: it is about time their residents write to their state representatives.
Bankrupcy and home ownership.
In order to be declared bankrupt, someone must not have assetts to cover his/her debts.
If someone has a house loan (mortgage) and default son it (doesn't pay) the bank can take it away. This happened BEFORE the Bankrupcy Laws enacted by Bush, and AFTER.
If someone has paid off a house, but has other debts, most states have Homestead Protection Acts. Those Laws protect the home from court settlements. (I know Massachusetts and Florida have such laws).
For those states that don't have Homestead Protection Acts: it is about time their residents write to their state representatives.
BTW, I totally agree with you on the point of lawsuit limits. I am against limiting medical malpractice lawsuit awards. Responsibility is having to pay for your mistakes (voluntary or involuntary ones). If a company or doctor make a mistake, they have to pay. And maimim or killing a person (willingly, or unwillingly) is priceless.
